| #covid19FRI is the #tagcoding hashtag for fighting the Corona pandemic in Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes (France) |
|---|
The #WWlgu / #EUlgu / #FRlgu tag of Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes is #FRI
Fighting a pandemic, we must do together, especially also at the local level, by social distancing to flatten the curve and contain the viral spread.
Local information and communication channels are essential, yet not trivial via social media.
That's why knowing and using the #covid19lgu tagcoding hashtag may save lifes.
Tweet: Fighting #COVID19 in Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes ? Use #covid19FRI to share and retrieve facts, data and advice! (France - #covid19FR - #covid19lgu) or Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes - #covid19FRI (France - #covid19FR - #covid19lgu).
The NUTS2 subdivisions of Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes, with #EUlgu hashtag:
| NUTS2 subdivision | #FRlgu #EUlgu tag | |
|---|---|---|
| Aquitaine | #FRI1 | |
| Limousin | #FRI2 | ] |
| Poitou-Charentes | #FRI3 |
Aquitaine and Official website
Limousin
Poitou-Charentes
#EUlgu #tag clouds
- #EUlgu #tagcoding hashtags for NUTS 1 areas
- #EUlgu #tagcoding hashtags for NUTS 2 areas
- #EUlgu #tagcoding hashtags for NUTS 3 areas
Curated open data for Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes
"Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes in the World Data Atlas (via Knoema)
- NUTS 2 in Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes (NUTS 1)
- NUTS 1 in France (Country)
- NUTS 1 in EU member states
- NUTS 2 and 3 in Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes (NUTS 1)
- NUTS 1,2 and 3 in France (Country)
- Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes Comments
- Alsace-Champagne-Ardenne-Lorraine
- Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes
- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
- Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
- Bretagne
- Centre-Val de Loire
- Corse
- Île de France
- Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées
- Nord-Pas-de-Calais-Picardie
- Normandie
- Pays de la Loire
- Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
- Regions Ultraperipheriques Francaises
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
-
France
- Alsace-Champagne-Ardenne-Lorraine
- Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes
- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
- Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
- Bretagne
- Centre-Val de Loire
- Corse
- Île de France
- Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées
- Nord-Pas-de-Calais-Picardie
- Normandie
- Pays de la Loire
- Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
- Regions Ultraperipheriques Francaises
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Ireland
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Netherlands
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Alsace-Champagne-Ardenne-Lorraine
- Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes
- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
- Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
- Bretagne
- Centre-Val de Loire
- Corse
- Île de France
- Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées
- Nord-Pas-de-Calais-Picardie
- Normandie
- Pays de la Loire
- Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
- Regions Ultraperipheriques Francaises
Is development effective? For observations and comments regarding the development effectiveness and synergy in your province, give comments at this page. You can also express your ideas on what initiatives are most urgently needed. If possible explain why you think so.
participation content steward
access to information officer
If you have a Facebook page, a Blog or a website in which you address local development and governance topics, let us know in the Comments section to include it in this window.
