The #WWlgu / #FRlgu tag of Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées is #FRJ
- #tagcoding in Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées
- NUTS2 of Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées, with #EUlgu hashtags
- Useful links
#tagcoding means that one uses standardized hashtags to relate online information to specific topics in order to structure it and retrieve it easily.
This page introduces systematically defined hashtags for local government units in Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées.
#tagcoding hashtags cover another four topic dimensions:
- the sustainable development goals and targets,
- economic activities,
- functions of government, and
- products and services.
Local information and communication channels are essential, yet not trivial via social media.
That's why knowing and using tagcoding hashtags will improve communications in the public sphere of Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées.
The NUTS2 subdivisions of Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées, with #EUlgu hashtag:
| NUTS2 subdivision | #FRlgu #EUlgu tag | |
|---|---|---|
| Languedoc-Roussillon | #FRJ1 | |
| Midi-Pyrénées | #FRJ2 |
Languedoc-Roussillon and Official website
Midi-Pyrénées
#EUlgu #tag clouds
- #EUlgu #tagcoding hashtags for NUTS 1 areas
- #EUlgu #tagcoding hashtags for NUTS 2 areas
- #EUlgu #tagcoding hashtags for NUTS 3 areas
Curated open data for Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées
"Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées in the World Data Atlas (via Knoema)
- NUTS 2 in Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées (NUTS 1)
- NUTS 1 in France (Country)
- NUTS 1 in EU member states
- NUTS 2 and 3 in Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées (NUTS 1)
- NUTS 1,2 and 3 in France (Country)
- Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées Comments
- Alsace-Champagne-Ardenne-Lorraine
- Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes
- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
- Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
- Bretagne
- Centre-Val de Loire
- Corse
- Île de France
- Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées
- Nord-Pas-de-Calais-Picardie
- Normandie
- Pays de la Loire
- Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
- Regions Ultraperipheriques Francaises
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
-
France
- Alsace-Champagne-Ardenne-Lorraine
- Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes
- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
- Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
- Bretagne
- Centre-Val de Loire
- Corse
- Île de France
- Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées
- Nord-Pas-de-Calais-Picardie
- Normandie
- Pays de la Loire
- Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
- Regions Ultraperipheriques Francaises
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Ireland
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Netherlands
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Alsace-Champagne-Ardenne-Lorraine
- Aquitaine-Limousin-Poitou-Charentes
- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
- Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
- Bretagne
- Centre-Val de Loire
- Corse
- Île de France
- Languedoc-Roussillon-Midi-Pyrénées
- Nord-Pas-de-Calais-Picardie
- Normandie
- Pays de la Loire
- Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
- Regions Ultraperipheriques Francaises
Is development effective? For observations and comments regarding the development effectiveness and synergy in your province, give comments at this page. You can also express your ideas on what initiatives are most urgently needed. If possible explain why you think so.
participation content steward
access to information officer
If you have a Facebook page, a Blog or a website in which you address local development and governance topics, let us know in the Comments section to include it in this window.
